WowBB Forums Home 
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register
WowBB Forums > Sports And Wrestling > Sports Talk > Fit just hit the shan for the Saints

 Moderated by: Ron, brodiescomics, beejmi Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next Page Last Page  
New Topic Reply Printer Friendly
Fit just hit the shan for the Saints  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost
 Posted: Sun Mar 4th, 2012 09:06 pm
  PM Quote Reply
46th Post
katook



Joined: Tue Sep 21st, 2010
Location: In A Trailerpark Filled With Rednecks, North Carolina USA
Posts: 3371
Status: 
Offline
because it's not as easy to win when you have to play fair.



____________________
since there doesn't seem to be a way to be vocal about being an Atheist without coming across as a condescending cock opening about it, you might as well go all the way with it.--Sek69
Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sun Mar 4th, 2012 09:17 pm
  PM Quote Reply
47th Post
stingmark



Joined: Mon Oct 15th, 2007
Location: Cop City, California USA
Posts: 9390
Status: 
Offline
katook wrote:
because it's not as easy to win when you have to play fair.


This. Spot on. Patriots dont cheat= havent win in 5 yrs.

Saints dont cheat= wont win either.



____________________
"I went to the #6th ranked liberal Arts College in California, I'm smarter than anyone else"(Also found out to be a formerly racist institution-Jeff Forsyth)




Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sun Mar 4th, 2012 09:20 pm
  PM Quote Reply
48th Post
Road Warrior Yajuta



Joined: Sat Jul 3rd, 2010
Location: D'Iberville, Ms, USA
Posts: 4798
Status: 
Offline
stingmark wrote: katook wrote:
because it's not as easy to win when you have to play fair.


This. Spot on. Patriots dont cheat= havent win in 5 yrs.

Saints dont cheat= wont win either.
Okay this is where you lose any credibility.  What the Saints did may be dirty but it is not cheating.  It is Football and had there been no bounty hunter fund not the first damn person would say it is cheating.



____________________
Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sun Mar 4th, 2012 09:47 pm
  PM Quote Reply
49th Post
BayouBoogie



Joined: Wed Oct 17th, 2007
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana USA
Posts: 6864
Status: 
Offline
stingmark wrote:
katook wrote:
because it's not as easy to win when you have to play fair.


This. Spot on. Patriots dont cheat= havent win in 5 yrs.

Saints dont cheat= wont win either.


This is absolutely ridiculous. Please llok at the Patriots record over that time period and tell me they "don't win." Absolute nonsense.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sun Mar 4th, 2012 10:53 pm
  PM Quote Reply
50th Post
stingmark



Joined: Mon Oct 15th, 2007
Location: Cop City, California USA
Posts: 9390
Status: 
Offline
Road Warrior Yajuta wrote:
stingmark wrote: katook wrote:
because it's not as easy to win when you have to play fair.


This. Spot on. Patriots dont cheat= havent win in 5 yrs.

Saints dont cheat= wont win either.
Okay this is where you lose any credibility.  What the Saints did may be dirty but it is not cheating.  It is Football and had there been no bounty hunter fund not the first damn person would say it is cheating.


You mentioned how if they dont play fair, they dont win. Thats the case w/the Saints too I guess. Cant have it both ways.

I was being facetious when I said that about the Saints, as if to say if you dont cheat, you dont win I guess? Saints/Lions/whoever doesnt cheat like the Cheatriots, you dont win.



____________________
"I went to the #6th ranked liberal Arts College in California, I'm smarter than anyone else"(Also found out to be a formerly racist institution-Jeff Forsyth)




Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sun Mar 4th, 2012 10:57 pm
  PM Quote Reply
51st Post
stingmark



Joined: Mon Oct 15th, 2007
Location: Cop City, California USA
Posts: 9390
Status: 
Offline
BayouBoogie wrote:
stingmark wrote:
katook wrote:
because it's not as easy to win when you have to play fair.


This. Spot on. Patriots dont cheat= havent win in 5 yrs.

Saints dont cheat= wont win either.


This is absolutely ridiculous. Please llok at the Patriots record over that time period and tell me they "don't win." Absolute nonsense.


Please look &tell me how many sbs NEs won since spygate? (that would be ZERO), which means what Yajuta said, does have some truth to it.

Thats not ridiculous thats fact.

Last edited on Sun Mar 4th, 2012 11:11 pm by stingmark



____________________
"I went to the #6th ranked liberal Arts College in California, I'm smarter than anyone else"(Also found out to be a formerly racist institution-Jeff Forsyth)




Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sun Mar 4th, 2012 10:57 pm
  PM Quote Reply
52nd Post
Road Warrior Yajuta



Joined: Sat Jul 3rd, 2010
Location: D'Iberville, Ms, USA
Posts: 4798
Status: 
Offline
stingmark wrote: Road Warrior Yajuta wrote:
stingmark wrote: katook wrote:
because it's not as easy to win when you have to play fair.


This. Spot on. Patriots dont cheat= havent win in 5 yrs.

Saints dont cheat= wont win either.
Okay this is where you lose any credibility.  What the Saints did may be dirty but it is not cheating.  It is Football and had there been no bounty hunter fund not the first damn person would say it is cheating.


You mentioned how if they dont play fair, they dont win. Thats the case w/the Saints too I guess. Cant have it both ways.

I was being facetious when I said that about the Saints, as if to say if you dont cheat, you dont win I guess? Saints/Lions/whoever doesnt cheat like the Cheatriots, you dont win.
Point is they broke rules about paying bounties.  They would have played the same without it.  No bounty fund=nothing to see here.  Without the payments it would have been football.  Every play results in people looking to knock star players on the other team out of the game.  Anyone wants to think otherwise is either deluded or never played organized football.  Not saying it is right, but that is the nature of it. 



____________________
Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sun Mar 4th, 2012 10:58 pm
  PM Quote Reply
53rd Post
Road Warrior Yajuta



Joined: Sat Jul 3rd, 2010
Location: D'Iberville, Ms, USA
Posts: 4798
Status: 
Offline
stingmark wrote: BayouBoogie wrote:
stingmark wrote:
katook wrote:
because it's not as easy to win when you have to play fair.


This. Spot on. Patriots dont cheat= havent win in 5 yrs.

Saints dont cheat= wont win either.


This is absolutely ridiculous. Please llok at the Patriots record over that time period and tell me they "don't win." Absolute nonsense.


Please look &tell me how many sbs NEs won since spygate? (that would be ZERO), which means what Katook said, does have some truth to it.

Thats not ridiculous thats fact.
They still win games but I can't lie and say I haven't noticed no titles since it happened. 



____________________
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sun Mar 4th, 2012 11:05 pm
  PM Quote Reply
54th Post
stingmark



Joined: Mon Oct 15th, 2007
Location: Cop City, California USA
Posts: 9390
Status: 
Offline
Road Warrior Yajuta wrote:
stingmark wrote: Road Warrior Yajuta wrote:
stingmark wrote: katook wrote:
because it's not as easy to win when you have to play fair.


This. Spot on. Patriots dont cheat= havent win in 5 yrs.

Saints dont cheat= wont win either.
Okay this is where you lose any credibility.  What the Saints did may be dirty but it is not cheating.  It is Football and had there been no bounty hunter fund not the first damn person would say it is cheating.


You mentioned how if they dont play fair, they dont win. Thats the case w/the Saints too I guess. Cant have it both ways.

I was being facetious when I said that about the Saints, as if to say if you dont cheat, you dont win I guess? Saints/Lions/whoever doesnt cheat like the Cheatriots, you dont win.
Point is they broke rules about paying bounties.  They would have played the same without it.  No bounty fund=nothing to see here.  Without the payments it would have been football.  Every play results in people looking to knock star players on the other team out of the game.  Anyone wants to think otherwise is either deluded or never played organized football.  Not saying it is right, but that is the nature of it. 


Knowingly broke rules & continued doing so=(technically)cheating, so yeah, the league thinks they cheated, so.........many others do too.



____________________
"I went to the #6th ranked liberal Arts College in California, I'm smarter than anyone else"(Also found out to be a formerly racist institution-Jeff Forsyth)




Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sun Mar 4th, 2012 11:09 pm
  PM Quote Reply
55th Post
stingmark



Joined: Mon Oct 15th, 2007
Location: Cop City, California USA
Posts: 9390
Status: 
Offline
Road Warrior Yajuta wrote:
stingmark wrote: BayouBoogie wrote:
stingmark wrote:
katook wrote:
because it's not as easy to win when you have to play fair.


This. Spot on. Patriots dont cheat= havent win in 5 yrs.

Saints dont cheat= wont win either.


This is absolutely ridiculous. Please llok at the Patriots record over that time period and tell me they "don't win." Absolute nonsense.


Please look &tell me how many sbs NEs won since spygate? (that would be ZERO), which means what Katook said, does have some truth to it.

Thats not ridiculous thats fact.
They still win games but I can't
lie and say I haven't noticed no titles since it happened. 


Which was my point when I said they hadnt won since being busted for cheating. Regular season means NOTHING, its what you win in the playoffs that does. Ask any :13-3, 14-2, 15-1 regular season team about that.

Last edited on Sun Mar 4th, 2012 11:10 pm by stingmark



____________________
"I went to the #6th ranked liberal Arts College in California, I'm smarter than anyone else"(Also found out to be a formerly racist institution-Jeff Forsyth)




Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sun Mar 4th, 2012 11:11 pm
  PM Quote Reply
56th Post
Road Warrior Yajuta



Joined: Sat Jul 3rd, 2010
Location: D'Iberville, Ms, USA
Posts: 4798
Status: 
Offline
stingmark wrote: Road Warrior Yajuta wrote:
stingmark wrote: Road Warrior Yajuta wrote:
stingmark wrote: katook wrote:
because it's not as easy to win when you have to play fair.


This. Spot on. Patriots dont cheat= havent win in 5 yrs.

Saints dont cheat= wont win either.
Okay this is where you lose any credibility.  What the Saints did may be dirty but it is not cheating.  It is Football and had there been no bounty hunter fund not the first damn person would say it is cheating.


You mentioned how if they dont play fair, they dont win. Thats the case w/the Saints too I guess. Cant have it both ways.

I was being facetious when I said that about the Saints, as if to say if you dont cheat, you dont win I guess? Saints/Lions/whoever doesnt cheat like the Cheatriots, you dont win.
Point is they broke rules about paying bounties.  They would have played the same without it.  No bounty fund=nothing to see here.  Without the payments it would have been football.  Every play results in people looking to knock star players on the other team out of the game.  Anyone wants to think otherwise is either deluded or never played organized football.  Not saying it is right, but that is the nature of it. 


Knowingly broke rules & continued doing so=(technically)cheating, so yeah, the league thinks they cheated, so.........many others do too.
Semantics aside, rule breaking and cheating do not always mean the same thing. 



____________________
Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sun Mar 4th, 2012 11:16 pm
  PM Quote Reply
57th Post
stingmark



Joined: Mon Oct 15th, 2007
Location: Cop City, California USA
Posts: 9390
Status: 
Offline
Road Warrior Yajuta wrote:
stingmark wrote: Road Warrior Yajuta wrote:
stingmark wrote: Road Warrior Yajuta wrote:
stingmark wrote: katook wrote:
because it's not as easy to win when you have to play fair.


This. Spot on. Patriots dont cheat= havent win in 5 yrs.

Saints dont cheat= wont win either.
Okay this is where you lose any credibility.  What the Saints did may be dirty but it is not cheating.  It is Football and had there been no bounty hunter fund not the first damn person would say it is cheating.


You mentioned how if they dont play fair, they dont win. Thats the case w/the Saints too I guess. Cant have it both ways.

I was being facetious when I said that about the Saints, as if to say if you dont cheat, you dont win I guess? Saints/Lions/whoever doesnt cheat like the Cheatriots, you dont win.
Point is they broke rules about paying bounties.  They would have played the same without it.  No bounty fund=nothing to see here.  Without the payments it would have been football.  Every play results in people looking to knock star players on the other team out of the game.  Anyone wants to think otherwise is either deluded or never played organized football.  Not saying it is right, but that is the nature of it. 


Knowingly broke rules & continued doing so=(technically)cheating, so yeah, the league thinks they cheated, so.........many others do too.
Semantics aside, rule breaking and cheating do not always mean the same thing. 


Very true......tell Commish Goodell that when he hands down punishment.



____________________
"I went to the #6th ranked liberal Arts College in California, I'm smarter than anyone else"(Also found out to be a formerly racist institution-Jeff Forsyth)




Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sun Mar 4th, 2012 11:18 pm
  PM Quote Reply
58th Post
Road Warrior Yajuta



Joined: Sat Jul 3rd, 2010
Location: D'Iberville, Ms, USA
Posts: 4798
Status: 
Offline
stingmark wrote: Road Warrior Yajuta wrote:
stingmark wrote: Road Warrior Yajuta wrote:
stingmark wrote: Road Warrior Yajuta wrote:
stingmark wrote: katook wrote:
because it's not as easy to win when you have to play fair.


This. Spot on. Patriots dont cheat= havent win in 5 yrs.

Saints dont cheat= wont win either.
Okay this is where you lose any credibility.  What the Saints did may be dirty but it is not cheating.  It is Football and had there been no bounty hunter fund not the first damn person would say it is cheating.


You mentioned how if they dont play fair, they dont win. Thats the case w/the Saints too I guess. Cant have it both ways.

I was being facetious when I said that about the Saints, as if to say if you dont cheat, you dont win I guess? Saints/Lions/whoever doesnt cheat like the Cheatriots, you dont win.
Point is they broke rules about paying bounties.  They would have played the same without it.  No bounty fund=nothing to see here.  Without the payments it would have been football.  Every play results in people looking to knock star players on the other team out of the game.  Anyone wants to think otherwise is either deluded or never played organized football.  Not saying it is right, but that is the nature of it. 


Knowingly broke rules & continued doing so=(technically)cheating, so yeah, the league thinks they cheated, so.........many others do too.
Semantics aside, rule breaking and cheating do not always mean the same thing. 


Very true......tell Commish Goodell that when he hands down punishment.
Aw man like I give a flying fuck what that pedantic know it all tard thinks!  :D



____________________
Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sun Mar 4th, 2012 11:22 pm
  PM Quote Reply
59th Post
Road Warrior Yajuta



Joined: Sat Jul 3rd, 2010
Location: D'Iberville, Ms, USA
Posts: 4798
Status: 
Offline
http://www.wwltv.com/around-the-web/Report-Gregg-Williams-to-meet-with-commissioner-Monday-141370153.html

I am no Goodhell fan, but I give the man this.  He does not dick around when it comes to junk like this.



____________________
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sun Mar 4th, 2012 11:41 pm
  PM Quote Reply
60th Post
BayouBoogie



Joined: Wed Oct 17th, 2007
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana USA
Posts: 6864
Status: 
Offline
stingmark wrote:
BayouBoogie wrote:
stingmark wrote:
katook wrote:
because it's not as easy to win when you have to play fair.


This. Spot on. Patriots dont cheat= havent win in 5 yrs.

Saints dont cheat= wont win either.


This is absolutely ridiculous. Please llok at the Patriots record over that time period and tell me they "don't win." Absolute nonsense.


Please look &tell me how many sbs NEs won since spygate? (that would be ZERO), which means what Yajuta said, does have some truth to it.

Thats not ridiculous thats fact.


You didn't say winning Super Bowls. You said "winning" and they have one of, if not the, best record in the league in that period. Also made 2 SuperBowls which they lost to comebacks in the final minutes. Yes, your statement is ridiculous.

You do realize that only one team per year wins the SupeBowl. It doesn't mean that the rest of them suck.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

Current time is 04:58 pm Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next Page Last Page    
WowBB Forums > Sports And Wrestling > Sports Talk > Fit just hit the shan for the Saints Top




UltraBB 1.172 Copyright © 2007-2013 Data 1 Systems