| Author | Post |
|---|
BigJ
United States Champion
|
Posted: Fri Oct 3rd, 2008 11:24 pm |
|
dogfacedgremlin34 wrote: HBF wrote: dogfacedgremlin34 wrote: HBF wrote: Actually, that game is missing the most widely used term from last night-ENERGY.
And how many times is she going to call it Nuke-u-lor?
The proper term is Nuclear.
I hit dictionary.com which told me a group of idiots mis-pronounce this simple term.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/nuclear
Unfortunately, my party's VP candidate is one of them.
It also left off a square for when she does things that are completely inappropriate...like incessantly winking at the camera, or giving a "shout out" (her words, not mine) to a bunch of Alaskan third graders, or delivering lines like "Doggone it" or "Say it ain't so, Joe!"
God this bitch is vapid. All style, zero substance.
I could apply the same principle to Obama.
No you couldn't. Tell you what...give it a try.
God Obama is vapid. All style, zero substance.
That was difficult.
____________________
The rightful Champion of these United States. Or for you illiterates, El Campeon de los Estados Unidos.
|
dogfacedgremlin34
| Joined: | Fri Feb 8th, 2008 |
| Location: | Massachusetts USA |
| Posts: | 3700 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 3rd, 2008 11:28 pm |
|
BigJ wrote: dogfacedgremlin34 wrote: HBF wrote: dogfacedgremlin34 wrote: HBF wrote: Actually, that game is missing the most widely used term from last night-ENERGY.
And how many times is she going to call it Nuke-u-lor?
The proper term is Nuclear.
I hit dictionary.com which told me a group of idiots mis-pronounce this simple term.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/nuclear
Unfortunately, my party's VP candidate is one of them.
It also left off a square for when she does things that are completely inappropriate...like incessantly winking at the camera, or giving a "shout out" (her words, not mine) to a bunch of Alaskan third graders, or delivering lines like "Doggone it" or "Say it ain't so, Joe!"
God this bitch is vapid. All style, zero substance.
I could apply the same principle to Obama.
No you couldn't. Tell you what...give it a try.
God Obama is vapid. All style, zero substance.
That was difficult.
Examples?
Edit: Patiently waiting for Big J to furiously finish his Google search "Obama + vapid"
Last edited on Fri Oct 3rd, 2008 11:31 pm by dogfacedgremlin34
|
HBF
| Joined: | Mon Oct 15th, 2007 |
| Location: | Atlanta |
| Posts: | 7283 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 3rd, 2008 11:58 pm |
|
Actually, DFG, you're contradicting yourself in the statement of somebody being vapid yet having style. She did better than expected, so you are partially right-on. "Vapid" means lacking style, so I don't get the connection.
Obama is all style and NO SUBSTANCE. THIS MOTHERFUCKER HASN'T DONE ANYTHING COMPARED TO HIS OPPONENT OR EVEN HIS VP (who smokes him in every area)!
Let's at least be completely honest in our assessments. Obama is a nobody. He has no record. That might be a good thing given our current state to some people, but the fucker has done NOTHING.
I've been completely honest in stating I disagree with the GOP views on Iraq (I support the DEM idea there) and I don't think it's unnatural to think that one's ideas can cross party lines. McCain has a history of doing the same. Obama is a 100% voted left-winger so don't even try to interpret fact. It's fact.
About the left-wing candidate:
Obama: He's a half-black, Alfred E-Neumann-lookalike, Oprah-creation that has not done a fucking thing before this. Kind of like George Bush before he took office based upon the recommendation of his father to the GOP party leaders. Not a good match.
If you gave me Al Gore as a candidate this time, you'd have something. You might even make me consider my voting along party lines.
You do realize that Obama is maybe the 50th most qualified person in your party to run, right?
If you really look at the big picture, the closer candidate to Bush in terms of experience AND capabilities is Obama.
So, if you want more of the same all of you are truly complaining about, vote for Oprah boy.
That's it. I've waited a while to state how I really feel but this guy is a fucking chooch any way you look at it.
FYI-where are the names of the <$200 donors?
Oh, I know, OPRAH WINFREY!
____________________
Bix: "At least people in the wrestling business who think this have an excuse to think this because they're convinced that life is a work.
You don't have that excuse."
|
dogfacedgremlin34
| Joined: | Fri Feb 8th, 2008 |
| Location: | Massachusetts USA |
| Posts: | 3700 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 4th, 2008 12:15 am |
|
HBF wrote: Actually, DFG, you're contradicting yourself in the statement of somebody being vapid yet having style. She did better than expected, so you are partially right-on. "Vapid" means lacking style, so I don't get the connection.
Obama is all style and NO SUBSTANCE. THIS MOTHERFUCKER HASN'T DONE ANYTHING COMPARED TO HIS OPPONENT OR EVEN HIS VP (who smokes him in every area)!
Let's at least be completely honest in our assessments. Obama is a nobody. He has no record. That might be a good thing given our current state to some people, but the fucker has done NOTHING.
I've been completely honest in stating I disagree with the GOP views on Iraq (I support the DEM idea there) and I don't think it's unnatural to think that one's ideas can cross party lines. McCain has a history of doing the same. Obama is a 100% voted left-winger so don't even try to interpret fact. It's fact.
About the left-wing candidate:
Obama: He's a half-black, Alfred E-Neumann-lookalike, Oprah-creation that has not done a fucking thing before this. Kind of like George Bush before he took office based upon the recommendation of his father to the GOP party leaders. Not a good match.
If you gave me Al Gore as a candidate this time, you'd have something. You might even make me consider my voting along party lines.
You do realize that Obama is maybe the 50th most qualified person in your party to run, right?
If you really look at the big picture, the closer candidate to Bush in terms of experience AND capabilities is Obama.
So, if you want more of the same all of you are truly complaining about, vote for Oprah boy.
That's it. I've waited a while to state how I really feel but this guy is a fucking chooch any way you look at it.
FYI-where are the names of the <$200 donors?
Oh, I know, OPRAH WINFREY!
Firstly, "vapid" is also synonomous with an airhead. That's the context I was using. If it'll make things easier, feel free to substitute "dopey" for "vapid". With that in mind, you can argue that Obama is an airhead, but you'd be wrong. He's clearly intelligent...much more intelligent than Palin. Does he have any substance? Some. Not as much as I'd like, but infinitely more than Palin. And to be sure, he's certainly not vapid.
Secondly, the Dems are not my party. Never have been, never will be. Having said that, I cannot understand how any so called middle class citizen--which presumably you are, HBF--can identify with the GOP. I try, but I just can't.
Thirdly, you're right; Obama has done nothing. As far as being the 50th most qualified person in his party, again, could be right. With that in mind, I'd still take him every day of the week and twice on Tuesday over McCain. Why would you stick with the same old shit? He can call himself a maverick all he wants...it doesn't mean he is one.
Let me ask you this, HBF...what do you really think McCain is going to bring to the table? Do you really think he's the answer? It's easy to bash Obama. It's hard to tell me what your fossil is going to do when he's there. Maverick my ass. He's as much in the pocket of big business and the oil companies as his predecessor. And after he kicks the bucket in 2011 (when I will also win the S&W Death Pool), you're going to have Ann Coulter Jr. in charge? That's what you want? Jeez-zus, good luck with that. You know Palin thinks dinosaurs are 5,000 years old, right?
When all is said and done, I guess you could say this is really not an election of the best--it's an election of the "less worse". But really--what election in our lifetime hasn't been an election of the "less worse"? In any event, in this case, the less worse choice--by a mile--is Obama/Biden ticket.
I am not a Democrat, and I've approved this message.
Last edited on Sat Oct 4th, 2008 12:41 am by dogfacedgremlin34
|
Vintage Wrestling
|
Posted: Sat Oct 4th, 2008 12:58 am |
|
I love it when you guys argue about a couple of worthless fucks who will only drive this country deeper into shit.
Seriously guys, who fucking cares? All Democrats and Republicans are crooks. Debating which one is better is silly.
Both candidates make good points, but when push comes to shove, they can't do shit. All talk, minimal action.
Both parties are absolute jokes....a fucking sham. Experience doesn't mean shit. Dubya supossedly had a few years of experience and look at what he did. Clinton had twice as much experience and he didn't do much. Same can be said for many presidents. Look at Nixon...tons of experience, and he took us off the gold standard. That was HUGE.
Either way you vote, it is a vote for a loser. Too bad the "none of the above" box isn't available on the ballot.
Nobody is gonna change anything. Same shit, different pile.
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Obama has this wrapped up. I don't like him or McCain, but the obvious is hard to dismiss.
|
dogfacedgremlin34
| Joined: | Fri Feb 8th, 2008 |
| Location: | Massachusetts USA |
| Posts: | 3700 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 4th, 2008 01:05 am |
|
Vintage Wrestling wrote: I love it when you guys argue about a couple of worthless fucks who will only drive this country deeper into shit.
Seriously guys, who fucking cares? All Democrats and Republicans are crooks. Debating which one is better is silly.
Both candidates make good points, but when push comes to shove, they can't do shit. All talk, minimal action.
Both parties are absolute jokes....a fucking sham. Experience doesn't mean shit. Dubya supossedly had a few years of experience and look at what he did. Clinton had twice as much experience and he didn't do much. Same can be said for many presidents. Look at Nixon...tons of experience, and he took us off the gold standard. That was HUGE.
Either way you vote, it is a vote for a loser. Too bad the "none of the above" box isn't available on the ballot.
Nobody is gonna change anything. Same shit, different pile.
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Obama has this wrapped up. I don't like him or McCain, but the obvious is hard to dismiss.
I don't really think anarchy's the answer, but whatever. And since I'm not ready to go to my bomb shelter in the desert quite yet, I guess I'll just have to play my cards as they're dealt.
Look, I'm as cynical a fucker as the next guy...but I do hold out enough hope to think that maybe, in some way, who you elect can make a difference. Case in point is this retard we have in the White House now. If it were somebody with more than half a brain, do you think we'd really be in this shit we are now?
Short answer? No.
|
Vintage Wrestling
|
Posted: Sat Oct 4th, 2008 01:19 am |
|
dogfacedgremlin34 wrote: Vintage Wrestling wrote: I love it when you guys argue about a couple of worthless fucks who will only drive this country deeper into shit.
Seriously guys, who fucking cares? All Democrats and Republicans are crooks. Debating which one is better is silly.
Both candidates make good points, but when push comes to shove, they can't do shit. All talk, minimal action.
Both parties are absolute jokes....a fucking sham. Experience doesn't mean shit. Dubya supossedly had a few years of experience and look at what he did. Clinton had twice as much experience and he didn't do much. Same can be said for many presidents. Look at Nixon...tons of experience, and he took us off the gold standard. That was HUGE.
Either way you vote, it is a vote for a loser. Too bad the "none of the above" box isn't available on the ballot.
Nobody is gonna change anything. Same shit, different pile.
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Obama has this wrapped up. I don't like him or McCain, but the obvious is hard to dismiss.
I don't really think anarchy's the answer, but whatever. And since I'm not ready to go to my bomb shelter in the desert quite yet, I guess I'll just have to play my cards as they're dealt.
Look, I'm as cynical a fucker as the next guy...but I do hold out enough hope to think that maybe, in some way, who you elect can make a difference. Case in point is this retard we have in the White House now. If it were somebody with more than half a brain, do you think we'd really be in this shit we are now?
Short answer? No.
The local 7/11 employee could do a better job than Bush, BUT it is so far gone anyways. Damage done. You can't turn back the clock. If someone else would have been elected in 2000, things might be different, but probably not that much. I remember someone who could have made a difference... JFK. Look what happened to him. I would love to hope that who we elect would be for the better, but the track record is spotty at best. Bad to worse, then back to bad. Lose-Lose.
|
Married Jo
| Joined: | Fri Dec 21st, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 1595 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 4th, 2008 02:05 am |
|
HBF wrote: Actually, DFG, you're contradicting yourself in the statement of somebody being vapid yet having style. She did better than expected, so you are partially right-on. "Vapid" means lacking style, so I don't get the connection.
Obama is all style and NO SUBSTANCE. THIS MOTHERFUCKER HASN'T DONE ANYTHING COMPARED TO HIS OPPONENT OR EVEN HIS VP (who smokes him in every area)!
Let's at least be completely honest in our assessments. Obama is a nobody. He has no record. That might be a good thing given our current state to some people, but the fucker has done NOTHING.
I've been completely honest in stating I disagree with the GOP views on Iraq (I support the DEM idea there) and I don't think it's unnatural to think that one's ideas can cross party lines. McCain has a history of doing the same. Obama is a 100% voted left-winger so don't even try to interpret fact. It's fact.
About the left-wing candidate:
Obama: He's a half-black, Alfred E-Neumann-lookalike, Oprah-creation that has not done a fucking thing before this. Kind of like George Bush before he took office based upon the recommendation of his father to the GOP party leaders. Not a good match.
If you gave me Al Gore as a candidate this time, you'd have something. You might even make me consider my voting along party lines.
You do realize that Obama is maybe the 50th most qualified person in your party to run, right?
If you really look at the big picture, the closer candidate to Bush in terms of experience AND capabilities is Obama.
So, if you want more of the same all of you are truly complaining about, vote for Oprah boy.
That's it. I've waited a while to state how I really feel but this guy is a fucking chooch any way you look at it.
FYI-where are the names of the <$200 donors?
Oh, I know, OPRAH WINFREY!
nice! 
____________________
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife; the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sun up....sleep tight, mates, in your quilted Chambray nightshirts.
|
freebirdsforever2001
|
Posted: Sat Oct 4th, 2008 02:31 am |
|
BigJ wrote: pjstef wrote: freebirdsforever2001 wrote: that is why those trail park families and inner city women always seem to have about 10 rugrats running around. they have those kids so they can get that 1st of the month check and tax deduction at the end of the year. it's usually there only legal income of the year.
As long as government funds it, they will get more of it.
Make the people work for it.
300 bucks per. Every able bodied and able minded non-dangerous human being in this country that in any way lives dependent on the gov't (that means prisoners too) should be working a fucking 8 hour day.
i agree with you 100% big, j. i've been on disability for the past 4 months and i have been climbing the walls. i couldn't stay home 24/7 and do nothing living off of somebody else.
____________________
i'm not prejudice, i don't like anybody.
|
HBF
| Joined: | Mon Oct 15th, 2007 |
| Location: | Atlanta |
| Posts: | 7283 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 4th, 2008 03:57 am |
|
Fuck it. We're not going to change each other's votes (anyone arguing with me beyond this, I am not going to respond until tomorrow so consider you're "victory" pretty short)
Instead, I offer vintage Pearl Jam at their absolute finest (and I wonder, how the fuck did I turn down tickets to see these guys around this time?):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyz2A6wkV80
____________________
Bix: "At least people in the wrestling business who think this have an excuse to think this because they're convinced that life is a work.
You don't have that excuse."
|
dogfacedgremlin34
| Joined: | Fri Feb 8th, 2008 |
| Location: | Massachusetts USA |
| Posts: | 3700 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 4th, 2008 04:38 am |
|
HBF wrote: Instead, I offer vintage Pearl Jam at their absolute finest (and I wonder, how the fuck did I turn down tickets to see these guys around this time?):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyz2A6wkV80
Fantastic choice for nighttime video viewing, HBF! In '93-'94, I used to draw a comic strip for my college newspaper called "The Eddie Vedder Chronicles" in which a darker, borderline maniacal "Crazy Eddie Vedder" was the protagonist. His persona was based on and inspired by this exact type of stage act. Great memories!
*sigh* What a band. I especially love the end where he plays the cymbals with the mic stand. PJ--and the music scene in general--circa '91-'95 is very tough to beat.
Last edited on Sat Oct 4th, 2008 04:51 am by dogfacedgremlin34
|
thunderbolt
Believes That 99% Of The Lawyers Give The Rest A Bad Name
|
Posted: Sat Oct 4th, 2008 04:56 am |
|
I am struggling through the Angels game and that video made my night.
Pearl Jam indeed was top shelf during that time frame.
____________________
I've had ex-girlfriends that were less sensitive than this Crimson Mask guy
Who died and left a 14 year old in control of freedom of speech? - Gary Cubeta, 2009
|
HBF
| Joined: | Mon Oct 15th, 2007 |
| Location: | Atlanta |
| Posts: | 7283 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 4th, 2008 12:10 pm |
|
I am still kicking myself for turning down a free ticket to see Pearl Jam and Nirvana with the Red Hot Chili Peppers at (I think) the Roseland Ballroom on New Years Eve (must have been '12/31/91 IIRC). I liked some girl at the time. I'm an idiot!
____________________
Bix: "At least people in the wrestling business who think this have an excuse to think this because they're convinced that life is a work.
You don't have that excuse."
|
dogfacedgremlin34
| Joined: | Fri Feb 8th, 2008 |
| Location: | Massachusetts USA |
| Posts: | 3700 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 4th, 2008 12:25 pm |
|
HBF wrote: I am still kicking myself for turning down a free ticket to see Pearl Jam and Nirvana with the Red Hot Chili Peppers at (I think) the Roseland Ballroom on New Years Eve (must have been '12/31/91 IIRC). I liked some girl at the time. I'm an idiot!
Devastating! I think I went to the New England version of that same show during the fall of '91, except that it was PJ (who were relative unknowns then, "Ten" had just been released), followed by Smashing Pumpkins, and headlined by RHCP. One of the top five best shows all-time that I went to. Believe it or not, in their little 40 min. set, PJ still blew everybody else away that night--and keep in mind the Pumpkins and RHCP put on great shows of their own.Last edited on Sat Oct 4th, 2008 12:43 pm by dogfacedgremlin34
|
Hammer to Fall
| Joined: | Wed Nov 7th, 2007 |
| Location: | Near An Enigma |
| Posts: | 1137 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 4th, 2008 07:17 pm |
|
Long Rolling Stone article on John McCain:
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/make_believe_maverick_the_real_john_mccain
____________________
|
Current time is 12:57 am | Page:   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8   |
|
|
|