View single post by The Ultimate Sin
 Posted: Mon Jan 25th, 2010 05:11 pm
PM Quote Reply Full Topic
The Ultimate Sin

Joined: Mon Oct 15th, 2007
Location: Parts Unknown, Sri Lanka
Posts: 10141
stingmark wrote:
krazykid18 wrote: I think Faulk came the same yr as Warner did, so that point is incorrect. and Warner started to tail off as Faulk started slowing down just saying in STL.

No, Faulk came in in '94 w/the Colts, where he did ok...then got traded to the Rams in '99. C'mon man...stp the Warner hate. Im not a Warner  bandwagin jumper, he's been good for a very long time. This guy was stocking shevles @ one time in his career. Then he's a starting qb, and leads 3 different teams to a SB , winning one. I dont know too many guys that have done that? Did you see what he did in that 1st rd game? not too many 40yr old qbs can do that.


Plus, from 2002-2006, Faulks production actually went DOWN, while Warner's has stayed up. Maybe not in NY? but what a resurgence in AZ?

Here is an interesting truth, when the Rams started depending on Warner to make most of the plays their productivity declined. It started around half time of the Super Bowl against NE.

Originally they used Faulk as a runner and receiver to set up the deeper pass. It was a 60% Faulk to 40% others. As Martz (as OC and then HC) started believing in his mad genius hype the balance shifted the opposite way. They used the deep ball to set up the underneath stuff to Faulk. The consequence was a decline in productivity, and more hits to Warner which took its toll and sharpened the decline.

The fact is Warner and Faulk were an unstoppable combo, but when Martz made Faulk an after thought the offense got exploited.

May I offer you some salt and vinegar chips?