Hymie Itsu wrote:
Personally, I might have Sandusky face the winner of this tourney. It's not fair to have legitimate douches, whom have spent a long time honing their craft, be shot down just because they face off with him.
It sorta reminds me of the argument over who got nominated for "Weasel of the Week" last year. there are two levels of douches in Sports, the criminal element (Carruth, Sandusky, OJ), and the ones that were general dicks all around to everyone (Clemens, Bonds, that ilk).
Tough to resolve when voting outside of everyone's personal take on it. Bonds is a much bigger douche in sports than Sandusky, for example, but if Sandusky's criminal activity is factored in he more than likely gets my vote. If I don't factor it in, I vote for Bonds.
(Not sure which way I'd go with my vote, in this or any other case, just making an example here.)
I agree with this. This 'should' be primarily a douche tourney sans the criminal aspect. I mean, with Sandusky, whom is only a criminal, this is a spot that could have went to 'Tricky' Nicky Saban.
I mean, whom among us knew who the hell Sandusky was before this unless they followed Penn State on a Tammy Sytch-esque stalking scale?
Imagine a magical planet where people dont hang out on the Bouji board 24/7. ~ Portsalesman