View single post by srossi
 Posted: Tue Apr 9th, 2019 08:50 pm
PM Quote Reply Full Topic
srossi

 

Joined: Sun Oct 14th, 2007
Location: New York USA
Posts: 49778
Status: 
Offline
kargol wrote: carpetbeggar wrote: Franchise wrote: The camera thing really bothers me; I think I’d probably like the product 20% more if the camera didn’t do all of the zooming. What exactly is the point? Is it supposed to make everything feel devastating (I’m assuming so)
Yes, the idiot technical director Kevin Dunn has made watching the actual matches exhausting. Some wrestler will do some cool move and the camera will cut to some shitty angle two tenths of a second before impact.

To avoid the fact that there is no impact?

If that's a huge problem then maybe they need to teach guys how to work in WWE.  Indies don't do that and no other company ever has either, and unless there's a particular botch I've never noticed this as an issue.  Besides, there often IS an impact, and that's diminished by the directing.  The women were beating the shit out of each other last night and didn't need "help". 



____________________
This thread was great before AA ruined it.