View single post by tamalie
 Posted: Tue May 14th, 2019 04:35 pm
PM Quote Reply Full Topic


Joined: Mon Oct 22nd, 2007
Posts: 5133
In the documentary, I thought Tom Magee came off as a nice, down to earth guy who seemed at peace with not making it big in professional wrestling and genuinely flattered that fans considered this match to be an important part of pro wrestling folklore.

The match and Tom Magee need to be looked at through fall of 1986 eyes, not weathered 2019 eyes. In 1986, the average WWF match was pretty lousy. Guys were already largely on the juice and the roster looked much different physically compared to 1983, but things were still a ways from the freakish looks of 1989.

So here comes Tom Magee. He is muscular. He has great strength. He is ripped and defined to a degree I don't recall anyone in pro wrestling being at that time except for Rick Rude. He can do flips that next to no one in the United States and Canada was doing at the time except Owen Hart and Lanny Poffo who were much smaller guys. He wasn't handsome, but neither was Hulk Hogan, but at least this guy had good hair. Tom Magee was very green, but Bret Hart did a great job of carrying him and making him look decent and certainly full of potential. The idea then was not to get him on TV, but keep him off of it and get him more experience and skill. He wasn't close to the finished article, the holes in his game are evident, but I can absolutely see why Vince was so enthusiastic.

The match was fine, but wasn't spectacular. The aura about it was the idea that people knew it existed, but no one had ever seen it. The unavailability and the hope it might be out there somewhere was what drove interest.

Last edited on Tue May 14th, 2019 04:40 pm by tamalie