WowBB Forums Home 
WowBB Forums > Sports And Wrestling > Pro Wrestling > Your least favorite Royal Rumble

 Moderated by: Ron, brodiescomics, beejmi  
AuthorPost
Boz1515



Joined: Sat May 26th, 2012
Location:  
Posts: 1808
Status: 
Offline
The 1999 Royal Rumble was easily my least favorite.  That whole thing with McMahon and Austin being out the the ring for an hour is just stupid to me.  There should be a rule that the officials on the outside count you out if you do not (or cannot) return to the ring. 

Look at this entry roster.  Holy mid-carder, Batman. 


Royal Rumble entrances and eliminations A new entrant came out approximately every 90 seconds.[13]

1 Steve Austin  2 Mr. McMahon - Winner  3 Golga 4 Droz 5 Edge 6 Gillberg 7 Steve Blackman 8 Dan Severn 9 Tiger Ali Singh 10 The Blue Meanie 11 Mabel  12 Road Dogg  13 Gangrel  14 Kurrgan  15 Al Snow 16 Goldust  17 The Godfather 18 Kane  19 Ken Shamrock  20 Billy Gunn  21 Test  22 Big Boss Man  23 Triple H  24 Val Venis  25 X-Pac  26 Mark Henry  27 Jeff Jarrett  28 D'Lo Brown 29 Owen Hart  30 Chyna

Which is your least favorite Royal Rumble?

Last edited on Mon May 12th, 2014 12:24 am by Boz1515

One Fan Gang



Joined: Wed Apr 22nd, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 4514
Status: 
Offline
I watched the last 10-12 minutes of the 1996 Rumble again recently and found the whole presentation to be subpar. The first 5-6 events had a rough-around-the-edges charm to them in terms of spontaneity, and the production value along with the announcing made them must-view. As a final four participant, using Kama elicited zero drama. Horrendous. Missing key eliminations and even the mic'ing of the ring added to the disappointment.

sportatorium roach



Joined: Tue Oct 16th, 2007
Location: Southern IL
Posts: 1050
Status: 
Offline
I didn't pay much attention past 1999, but I'll go with 1995 if that was the one where the time between entrants was one minute instead of two.

broke



Joined: Tue Jan 22nd, 2008
Location: Bolton, ON
Posts: 3205
Status: 
Offline
95 is probably the worst

tofu_chipmunk



Joined: Wed Aug 5th, 2009
Location: Suburban Fatlanta, Georgia USA
Posts: 6706
Status: 
Offline
broke wrote: 95 is probably the worst
This is generally a safe answer for any "worst of WWE" question.

srossi

 

Joined: Sun Oct 14th, 2007
Location: New York USA
Posts: 51057
Status: 
Offline
The one with entries every 60 seconds was horrible.  There was also one that didn't go on last, and even worse, a Mark Henry match did.  Just ridiculous.  Which one was that?

bpickering
Hall Of Famer


Joined: Tue Nov 13th, 2007
Location: Highspire, Pennsylvania USA
Posts: 18044
Status: 
Offline
srossi wrote: The one with entries every 60 seconds was horrible.  There was also one that didn't go on last, and even worse, a Mark Henry match did.  Just ridiculous.  Which one was that?
2006 World Champion Kurt Angle defeated Mark Henry. Rey Jr won the Rumble that year.

There has been 5 times since the Event has been on PPV that the Rumble has not been on last.

2013 Rock vs CM Punk
2006 Kurt Angle vs Mark Henry
1998 Shawn Michaels vs Undertaker
1997 Shawn Michaels  vs Sid
1996 Undertaker vs Bret Hart

martini
Sunny's White Knight


Joined: Fri Aug 13th, 2010
Location:  
Posts: 3938
Status: 
Offline
Though the 1999 one looks bad on paper, you have to remember a lot of the guys cited as midcarders were on the cusp of being in main events or at the very least the upper midcard at that time.

And that Rumble was essentially a vehicle to further the McMahon-Austin storyline. It did that well and set up the McMahon-Austin showdown at St. Valentine's Day Massacre and the Rock-Austin match at WM XV.

cdewar19

 

Joined: Mon Feb 22nd, 2010
Location: In The Ruins Of CanadInns Stadium, Manitoba Canada
Posts: 1636
Status: 
Offline
The one that Michaels won by going "from start to finish" which lasted just over half an hour.

3setsof10

 

Joined: Mon May 26th, 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1794
Status: 
Offline
I think if there was a poll or write in here that the 1995 Royal Rumble would win by a large margin

Boz1515



Joined: Sat May 26th, 2012
Location:  
Posts: 1808
Status: 
Offline
martini wrote: Though the 1999 one looks bad on paper, you have to remember a lot of the guys cited as midcarders were on the cusp of being in main events or at the very least the upper midcard at that time.

Agreed.  A few were on the cusp, but how many people on that list actually had a chance of winning (as compared to other years)?

And that Rumble was essentially a vehicle to further the McMahon-Austin storyline.

While this is true, that is why I disliked it so much.  I like the Rumble itself as an event.  I felt like this Rumble was completely hijacked for the Austin/McMahon storyline.  The Rumble is a once a year specialty match.  I felt like I got ripped off or something.


PeteF3

 

Joined: Thu Dec 6th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 1476
Status: 
Offline
While not the worst overall, 1991 was the worst of the "classic era" Rumbles. Slow, boring, too many guys in the ring at once, and mid-carders with no chance inexplicably hanging around forever (Martel, Santana, Hercules, Valentine).



UltraBB 1.172 Copyright © 2007-2013 Data 1 Systems