WowBB Forums Home 
WowBB Forums > Sports And Wrestling > General Discussion > 2019 Rock 'n' Roll HOF Nominees

 Moderated by: Ron, brodiescomics, beejmi  
AuthorPost
srossi
Mr Monday Night!
 

Joined: Sun Oct 14th, 2007
Location: New York USA
Posts: 46742
Status: 
Offline
This is a pretty weak group to choose from, with some re-treads that weren't elected before and might make it now.

- Def Leppard
- Devo
- Janet Jackson
- John Prine (who?)
- Kraftwerk
- LL Cool J
- MC5
- Radiohead
- Rage Against the Machine
- Roxy Music (who?)
- Stevie Nicks
- The Cure
- Todd Rundgren
- Rufus & Chaka Khan
- The Zombies

I'd give my vote to MC5 and Rage.  Given the lack of real rock acts, I'll go with Def Leppard too, although I've never thought of them as HOF worthy despite being a fan. 

I love Stevie Nicks but come on, why does she deserve to go in solo instead of just with Fleetwood Mac?  Todd Rundgren I just don't get at all, but he's popular in some circles I know. 

Last edited on Tue Oct 9th, 2018 02:47 pm by srossi

KGB

 

Joined: Wed Jul 4th, 2012
Location:  
Posts: 1000
Status: 
Online
How many acts are inducted? I can't see how Radiohead or The Cure don't make the cut.

chrob61



Joined: Thu Nov 18th, 2010
Location: Michigan USA
Posts: 1929
Status: 
Offline
I've always loved me some Stevie, but this recent implosion of the Fleetwood Mac lineup minus Lindsay has left a rather sour taste in my mouth.

Is Stevie to blame for the split?? There are conflicting reports. But, based on her solo material I would consider her borderline HOF-worthy.

Erick Von Erich

 

Joined: Thu Mar 26th, 2015
Location: Texas USA
Posts: 411
Status: 
Offline
They usually go with about 6 inductees, every year, and try to cover all genres. So going with that, I'll predict:

-Devo (Mark Mothersbaugh's body of work is impressive...and he's basically the band)
-LL Cool J (to be "down" with those kids who like the rap hop... or NCIS: LA)
-Rage Against the Machine or Radiohead (one, but not both, to cover the 90's)
-Roxy Music (critical fave and they'd cover the 70's genre)
-Todd Rundgren (another critical fave, but they'd probably play up his "multimedia" stuff of the 90's as showing how "diverse" he is)
-The Zombies (cuz' oldsters love British Invasion stuff)

kargol



Joined: Thu Oct 18th, 2007
Location: Brum, United Kingdom
Posts: 4222
Status: 
Offline
srossi wrote:
- Roxy Music (who?)

Funnily enough they'd be the only one on the list - other than MC5 - I'd vote for.  They started as glam rock and morphed via art rock into sophisticated synthpop.  Were quite influential.  Lead singer Bryan Ferry boned Jerry Hall when she was hot.

srossi
Mr Monday Night!
 

Joined: Sun Oct 14th, 2007
Location: New York USA
Posts: 46742
Status: 
Offline
Def Leppard and Stevie Nicks are running away with the fan vote.  They basically have as many votes as every other act on the list combined.  MC5, for the 2nd year in a row, is receiving no fan support and that's just sad.

tamalie
Hall Of Famer
 

Joined: Mon Oct 22nd, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 4003
Status: 
Offline
The MC5 was ahead of their time and had a lot of influence on acts that followed. However, apart from "Kick Out the Jams", they are an act most people know little about and I'd even venture that more people know the name of that song than have actually heard it. They put out three albums in their late 1960s/early 1970s run and didn't get any commercial success, not even a Top 40 single that still gets oldies or classic rock radio play. They're a mystery to most people, the band you've possibly heard of and are told is important, but which you haven't listened to. It should not be surprising that they're not getting many fan votes.

Last edited on Tue Oct 9th, 2018 08:57 pm by tamalie

TerryWWWF



Joined: Mon Nov 26th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 4313
Status: 
Offline
Todd Rundgren.

gwlee7



Joined: Mon Oct 15th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 5266
Status: 
Offline
Just his production credits alone are enough for Rundgren to be in the HOF.

Angelic Assassin



Joined: Mon Dec 27th, 2010
Location: Driving Through Philly, Home Of Losers., Pennsylvania USA
Posts: 5369
Status: 
Offline
gwlee7 wrote: Just his production credits alone are enough for Rundgren to be in the HOF.
Quoted for truth. The rest aside from Stevie Nicks because I'd still like to bang her(again), can for all intents and purposes fuck off.

Married Jo



Joined: Fri Dec 21st, 2007
Location: Hickory NC
Posts: 6564
Status: 
Offline
Rossi, why would you consider rage HOF worthy and not DL? Def Leppard have them on album sales, ticket sales, longevity, etc. Damn, DL have TWO albums that have gone Diamond Platinum, i bet you can count the number of bands that have pulled that off on one hand..

Married Jo



Joined: Fri Dec 21st, 2007
Location: Hickory NC
Posts: 6564
Status: 
Offline
Ok, I just looked it up. Rock and Roll bands with multiple Diamond platinum original (not Live or Greatest hits) albums are:

The Beatles
Pink Floyd
Van Halen
Def Leppard

srossi
Mr Monday Night!
 

Joined: Sun Oct 14th, 2007
Location: New York USA
Posts: 46742
Status: 
Offline
Married Jo wrote: Rossi, why would you consider rage HOF worthy and not DL? Def Leppard have them on album sales, ticket sales, longevity, etc. Damn, DL have TWO albums that have gone Diamond Platinum, i bet you can count the number of bands that have pulled that off on one hand..
To really have this debate you’d have to blow up then existing HOF and start over because I couldn’t tell you what makes a HOF band here. Commercial success and even longevity seems to mean nothing, except when it means everything. It’s a pointless exercise to argue for or against any band, no different than wondering why Koko B. Ware is in the WWE HOF. To me, as a Def Leppard fan, they don’t meet my criteria as just feeling like a HOF band. Motley Crue meant more to the genre for anyone growing up in the early ‘80s (it’s hard to believe now but early Crue was taken as seriously as a brain tumor back then), and Def Lep never had the credibility and steer cred of Iron Maiden as far as NWOBHM bands go. They always seemed to be second to someone, but there’s no doubt they sold albums. 

Last edited on Wed Oct 10th, 2018 12:25 am by srossi

WongLee
Hall Of Famer


Joined: Fri Oct 19th, 2007
Location: Bay Shore, New York
Posts: 6615
Status: 
Offline
Married Jo wrote: Rossi, why would you consider rage HOF worthy and not DL? Def Leppard have them on album sales, ticket sales, longevity, etc. Damn, DL have TWO albums that have gone Diamond Platinum, i bet you can count the number of bands that have pulled that off on one hand..Rossi feels edgy when he listens to RATM because they use the word "motherfucker" in one of their songs.

srossi
Mr Monday Night!
 

Joined: Sun Oct 14th, 2007
Location: New York USA
Posts: 46742
Status: 
Offline
WongLee wrote: Married Jo wrote: Rossi, why would you consider rage HOF worthy and not DL? Def Leppard have them on album sales, ticket sales, longevity, etc. Damn, DL have TWO albums that have gone Diamond Platinum, i bet you can count the number of bands that have pulled that off on one hand..Rossi feels edgy when he listens to RATM because they use the word "motherfucker" in one of their songs.
It’s probably just because they hate the po-po. 

Married Jo



Joined: Fri Dec 21st, 2007
Location: Hickory NC
Posts: 6564
Status: 
Offline
All I know is screw insane criteria, if you’re one of only 4 rock bands with multiple diamond albums you’re a HOF lock IMO..

broke



Joined: Tue Jan 22nd, 2008
Location: Bolton, ON
Posts: 3031
Status: 
Offline
John Prine is a folk singer/songwriter, and a pretty good one, if not a bit quirky. The guy has been an indie darling since the 70's. Has a pretty decent collection of awards.

WongLee
Hall Of Famer


Joined: Fri Oct 19th, 2007
Location: Bay Shore, New York
Posts: 6615
Status: 
Offline
- Def Leppard - definitely yes. They sold several metric tons worth of albums. Not without its controversy though. I firmly believe Pete Willis should be up there. Do you ignore Vivian Campbell who has been with them (and everyone else seemingly) for well over 20 years?

- Devo - as far as originality goes. A definite yes. They have a boatload of great tunes and were indeed very popular in the late 70's and 80's. Borderline choice.

- Janet Jackson - Janet was a super-duper star for a while almost in the same ballpark as Michael. She was gutsy enough to experiment with different genres of music and was a fashion icon. Maybe

- John Prine - I went over to KKKlassics to see if Crimson Danny was salivating at the thought of this guy going in. Surprisingly he wasn't. If Dan Chernau doesn't think he's good enough, WongLee doesn't think he's good enough

- Kraftwerk - even Kraftwerks moms don't like Kraftwerk. The Fuhrer would have thrown these guys in Treblinka and have been done with them.

- LL Cool J - the guy was a massive star in his day. Decent actor too. But then you have the age old argument do colored hippity hoppity guys belong in a R8R HOF.

- MC5 - everyones kneejerk reaction is usually...YES, YES, HELL YES. But can you name one song besides Kick Out the Jams? Plus that song was only famous because they used the word motherfucker. Yeah they influenced a subgenre of music that was never that big to begin with. Neckbearded critics from the 70's through the 90's thought these guys were revolutionary but me, I'll take the Stooges anytime.

- Radiohead - probably yes because they were huge. Not a fan at all. However, millions are so that trumps me.

- Rage Against the Machine - sure. Great songs, great live band. But keep in mind, these guys aren't revolutionaries along the lines of Che and Pancho Villa. They are millionaire rock stars who sleep on mattresses stuffed with hundred dollar bills.

- Roxy Music - loved these guys in the 70's. Great, great albums and fashion icons. They will not make the cut though.

- Stevie Nicks - Stevie is just an enormous talent. Her solo albums are easily as good as anything Mac put out. I would vote yes.

- The Cure - too depressed to type anything

- Todd Rundgren - as a producer this is a no brainer. As a performer, totally meh.

- Rufus & Chaka Khan - I would vote yes. No, my "white guilt" is not making me do so. I say these guys at Shea Stadium in 1975 and they rocked as hard as any of their contemporaries. Everyone in this band were elite level musicians. Very enjoyable to listen to and watch on stage. Plus, for the decade of the 70's, Chaka Khan was the hottest woman on the planet. That was until her manager kept giving her two-fer coupons to Arbys.

- The Zombies - why?

srossi
Mr Monday Night!
 

Joined: Sun Oct 14th, 2007
Location: New York USA
Posts: 46742
Status: 
Offline
My God, Wong is ready to put 98 Degrees into the HOF, and maybe Nick Lachey as a solo act too. 

Last edited on Thu Oct 11th, 2018 02:02 pm by srossi

WongLee
Hall Of Famer


Joined: Fri Oct 19th, 2007
Location: Bay Shore, New York
Posts: 6615
Status: 
Offline
srossi wrote: My God, Wong is ready to put 98 Degrees into the HOF, and maybe Nick Lachey as a solo act too. Ok I'll play. Which parts of my post did you not agree with?

srossi
Mr Monday Night!
 

Joined: Sun Oct 14th, 2007
Location: New York USA
Posts: 46742
Status: 
Offline
WongLee wrote: srossi wrote: My God, Wong is ready to put 98 Degrees into the HOF, and maybe Nick Lachey as a solo act too. Ok I'll play. Which parts of my post did you not agree with?
I just think you're putting in almost everyone.  Just because someone was good or popular for a period of time doesn't mean they are HOF worthy.  Chaka Khan shouldn't sniff the HOF IMO.  Janet Jackson was never in the same stratosphere as Michael Jackson and is best remember for a nip slip.  I remember LL Cool J being somewhat popular in some circles, but "massive star"?  And again, I love Stevie Nicks and her solo stuff is good, but does that constitute her going into the HOF twice?  Is it a massive injustice if Stevie Nicks is simply a HOFer once with the band she's most famous for being in and does not suddenly become the equivalent of John Lennon?

Erick Von Erich

 

Joined: Thu Mar 26th, 2015
Location: Texas USA
Posts: 411
Status: 
Offline
Not arguing that Def Leppard was popular, but their "body of work" was basically two albums-- Pyromania and Hysteria.

When someone goes to see Def Leppard, today, they want to hear stuff from those two albums....and maybe "Bringing on the Heartache". Who the hell wants to hear "Let's Get Rocked" or "Me and my Wine"? The immense popularity of those two albums may actually work against them.

What may also hurt them is that I don't recall them being much of a influence or being praised for their technical prowess. "Yeah, I was inspired by Phil Collen and was blown away by his solo on Pour Some Sugar On me"...said nobody ever.

srossi
Mr Monday Night!
 

Joined: Sun Oct 14th, 2007
Location: New York USA
Posts: 46742
Status: 
Offline
Erick Von Erich wrote: Not arguing that Def Leppard was popular, but their "body of work" was basically two albums-- Pyromania and Hysteria.

When someone goes to see Def Leppard, today, they want to hear stuff from those two albums....and maybe "Bringing on the Heartache". Who the hell wants to hear "Let's Get Rocked" or "Me and my Wine"? The immense popularity of those two albums may actually work against them.

What may also hurt them is that I don't recall them being much of a influence or being praised for their technical prowess. "Yeah, I was inspired by Phil Collen and was blown away by his solo on Pour Some Sugar On me"...said nobody ever.

When I first got MTV, they played "Let's Get Rocked" ad nauseum.  It was a successful album, and super hyped, but didn't have staying power of their two classics from the '80s. 

Regarding Phil Collen, it's funny because Joe Satriani personally picked him to join his annual G3 tour featuring guitar masters, and was universally mocked for it.  He had to defend the decision and basically threw Def Leppard under the bus by saying, "The guy is a total virtuoso, but he's holding back because he's in a different kind of band."  If Satriani thinks he's that great, I won't argue with him,  but his playing on Def Lep songs is nothing ground-breaking.  It's fair to say that Def Lep is not technically respected, for whatever that's worth (and it's usually not worth much). 

Last edited on Thu Oct 11th, 2018 04:49 pm by srossi

Erick Von Erich

 

Joined: Thu Mar 26th, 2015
Location: Texas USA
Posts: 411
Status: 
Offline
srossi wrote: When I first got MTV, they played "Let's Get Rocked" ad nauseum.  It was a successful album, and super hyped, but didn't have staying power of their two classics from the '80s. 
"Let's Get Rocked" and its album "Adrenalize" came out in March, 1992. That was weird timing, because it was right after the huge grunge explosion of late 1991, plus other "alternative" bands, like RHCP, were growing in mainstream popularity. If it had been released even a year earlier, "Adrenalize" would've been huge. Yet it still proved successful...maybe out of habit. Think it had 4 singles that kept it on the radar until early 1993.
Def Leppard still did well, and even had an AOR hit in the summer of 1993 with "Two Steps Behind" from the Last Action Hero soundtrack. Probably wasn't until the fall of 1993 that their mainstream popularity declined, thanks to the "Beavis & Butt-head effect", when it became "cool" to trash 80's metal bands. I don't remember B&B specifically slamming Def Leppard, but the overall "pop metal/ radio friendly/hair band" thing was ridiculed.
Sorry. Don't mean to go off on a tangent. I just like talking about 80's/90's rock and especially metal.


And hey... to open a whole new can of worms: I'd put Blue Oyster Cult in the R&R HOF over any of this year's nominees.

srossi
Mr Monday Night!
 

Joined: Sun Oct 14th, 2007
Location: New York USA
Posts: 46742
Status: 
Offline
Erick Von Erich wrote: srossi wrote: When I first got MTV, they played "Let's Get Rocked" ad nauseum.  It was a successful album, and super hyped, but didn't have staying power of their two classics from the '80s. 
"Let's Get Rocked" and its album "Adrenalize" came out in March, 1992. That was weird timing, because it was right after the huge grunge explosion of late 1991, plus other "alternative" bands, like RHCP, were growing in mainstream popularity. If it had been released even a year earlier, "Adrenalize" would've been huge. Yet it still proved successful...maybe out of habit. Think it had 4 singles that kept it on the radar until early 1993.
Def Leppard still did well, and even had an AOR hit in the summer of 1993 with "Two Steps Behind" from the Last Action Hero soundtrack. Probably wasn't until the fall of 1993 that their mainstream popularity declined, thanks to the "Beavis & Butt-head effect", when it became "cool" to trash 80's metal bands. I don't remember B&B specifically slamming Def Leppard, but the overall "pop metal/ radio friendly/hair band" thing was ridiculed.
Sorry. Don't mean to go off on a tangent. I just like talking about 80's/90's rock and especially metal.


And hey... to open a whole new can of worms: I'd put Blue Oyster Cult in the R&R HOF over any of this year's nominees.

1991-1993 was the period when '80s metal bands who were already huge (GNR with the "Use Your Illusion" double album, Metallica with "The Black Album", Bon Jovi with "Keep the Faith", Aerosmith with "Get a Grip") were still doing their thing and having tons of success with it, while second- and third-tier '80s metal bands were absolutely being eviscerated by grunge and had absolutely no idea how to cope.  It was complete culture shock when everything was selling in 1989-1990 even if it sucked and then 1-2 years later, these newer or less talented bands that record companies had been fighting over were completely tossed to the curb, couldn't sell, got no advertising or touring money, and got dropped by their labels right after signing.  Warrant came out with their best album ever, "Dog Eat Dog", in April 1992.  This thing would've been huge 2 years earlier, but it died on the vine, and it was so damn good. 

Those few years were a very weird time because you could see the change coming, it already had come, but Guns N' Roses and Metallica were selling out stadiums on their co-headlining tour (this little song called "Enter Sandman" was doing fairly well) and right below that level all their contemporaries were seeing their pictures replaced by Nirvana's and Peal Jam's in the corporate HQ of the record labels.  But Nirvana and Pearl Jam were not the enemy, the cream always rises to the top, the problem was that the secondary grunge bands like Candlebox and Blind Melon were now getting all the attention that used to be reserved for the secondary metal bands in the copycat world of music. 

I'd put Def Leppard somewhere in the middle.  They weren't GNR but they weren't Warrant.  They had success, but they felt the pain.  By the time "Slang" and "Euphoria" came out in the late '90s, they were virtually a dead band.  They actually marketed "Slang" as a grunge album, which was as embarrassing as that time KISS tried to do disco in the '70s.  It was a brutal period for them and just about everyone else who didn't have the good sense to fade away.  Then time went on and nostalgia kicked in and they were able to make a living again playing their '80s material.  At this point, everything '80s is hot again and Def Leppard and Journey just had a very successful arena tour this summer where they played "Let's Get Rocked" and "Two Steps Behind" and every other song predated those.  They will absolutely never play a song live from their last 6 albums, which covers 1996-2015.  Never.  They might never make another album again either.  There's no money in it, and no market for it.  Fans who sell out Def Leppard shows to hear "Hysteria" won't buy a new album from them.

Last edited on Thu Oct 11th, 2018 07:21 pm by srossi

tamalie
Hall Of Famer
 

Joined: Mon Oct 22nd, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 4003
Status: 
Offline
On the topic of Warrant and "Dog Eat Dog", around 1996 or 1997, MTV News aired a documentary about the death of metal at the hands of grunge in the early 1990s. It interviewed various figures from that 1985 to 1991 glory period. Jani Lane and someone else from Warrant were among them. The two of them noted that before "Cherry Pie" came out they went to the office of their label's president for a meeting and the guy had a big Warrant poster in the office. They got the royal treatment and left pumped because they knew Warrant was getting the full court press from the label. When it came time for the follow up album, grunge had already broken big. They had another meeting with the same label president, but now instead of their poster, the spot on the wall was occupied by new darlings of the label Alice In Chains. The meeting was friendly, but not nearly as enthusiastic as the one from a few years before. On the elevator afterwards, the guys from Warrant looked at each other mournfully and agreed they were in big trouble.

Erick Von Erich

 

Joined: Thu Mar 26th, 2015
Location: Texas USA
Posts: 411
Status: 
Offline
That Alice in Chains/Warrant story is interesting. When AiC first came out in late 1990 with the single "We Die Young", they were going for that hair band/pop metal vibe. I remember seeing it and thinking they were like a Lynch Mob, Babylon AD, Love/Hate or any other second/third level metal band.

Then, about 3-4 months later, they released "Man in the Box" as a single and they had changed quite a bit... even though it was the same album. So, uh, good marketing?

That summer (1991) they were the opener on the "Clash of the Titans" tour with Slayer and Anthrax. They were almost boo'ed off the stage when they played the Red Rocks (Denver) stop.

So I always thought the "grunge" thing was a little unfair, especially to AiC and Soundgarden. I feel that they were metal bands, first, and got lumped with grunge for marketing purposes.

WongLee
Hall Of Famer


Joined: Fri Oct 19th, 2007
Location: Bay Shore, New York
Posts: 6615
Status: 
Offline
srossi wrote: WongLee wrote: srossi wrote: My God, Wong is ready to put 98 Degrees into the HOF, and maybe Nick Lachey as a solo act too. Ok I'll play. Which parts of my post did you not agree with?
I just think you're putting in almost everyone.  Just because someone was good or popular for a period of time doesn't mean they are HOF worthy.  Chaka Khan shouldn't sniff the HOF IMO.  Janet Jackson was never in the same stratosphere as Michael Jackson and is best remember for a nip slip.  I remember LL Cool J being somewhat popular in some circles, but "massive star"?  And again, I love Stevie Nicks and her solo stuff is good, but does that constitute her going into the HOF twice?  Is it a massive injustice if Stevie Nicks is simply a HOFer once with the band she's most famous for being in and does not suddenly become the equivalent of John Lennon?Rufus should definitely get real consideration. Four #1 albums in a row, Five #1 singles. Sold out tours. They co-headlined Shea Stadium as I mentioned with K.C. and the Sunshine Band in 1975. They had a nationwide broadcast on ABC Network of a massive Central Park concert they did the same year. These guys were the real deal.
Janet Jackson had one of the biggest selling albums of all time with Rhythm Nation 1814. She had #1 hit after #1 hit year after year. She was a total road dog and took out some huge tours that did sellout business here and abroad.
LL Cool J was at the forefront of raps golden age. The guy sold boatloads of records. He had a huge tour and probably the biggest rap tour of all time when he opened for Run DMC and the Beastie Boys.
Stevie Nicks is a better person than John Lennon because she never beat her wife or ignored her children, if she had any, which she didn't, but if she did she wouldn't have ignored them.

Erick Von Erich

 

Joined: Thu Mar 26th, 2015
Location: Texas USA
Posts: 411
Status: 
Offline
Actually, given the current cultural climate, the Hall would probably receive a huge backlash if at least one of Stevie Nicks, Janet Jackson or Rufus & Chaka Kahn didn't get in.

tamalie
Hall Of Famer
 

Joined: Mon Oct 22nd, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 4003
Status: 
Offline
"Man In The Box" wasn't really marketed as grunge when it came out in early 1991. It was played on Headbangers Ball. The sleeve for the single showed the band in more of hard rock to metal stylings although not like a Poison or Motley Crue. The video with Layne Staley in that druid robe clearly played to a metal audience. "Smells Like Teen Spirit" didn't come out until the fall. "Nevermind" wasn't in the album charts until this week in 1991 and it entered at #144. The single was #5 on the modern rock charts at that point, but modern rock radio wasn't a format that had much commercial clearance or success. Once it caught on, it caught on fast though. At that point Alice In Chains was repackaged and rode the grunge wave. They might have been more at home in that genre, but that's not how they were presented when they first hit.

TerryWWWF



Joined: Mon Nov 26th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 4313
Status: 
Offline
Rufus had five No. 1 hits?

WongLee
Hall Of Famer


Joined: Fri Oct 19th, 2007
Location: Bay Shore, New York
Posts: 6615
Status: 
Offline
TerryWWWF wrote: Rufus had five No. 1 hits?1974 - You Got the Love
1975 - Sweet Thing
1977 - At Midnight
1979 - Do You Love What You Feel
1983 - Ain't Nobody

Last edited on Fri Oct 12th, 2018 12:18 am by WongLee

TerryWWWF



Joined: Mon Nov 26th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 4313
Status: 
Offline
Those were all No. 1 on the R & B charts, not the Billboard Hot 100.

WongLee
Hall Of Famer


Joined: Fri Oct 19th, 2007
Location: Bay Shore, New York
Posts: 6615
Status: 
Offline
TerryWWWF wrote: Those were all No. 1 on the R & B charts, not the Billboard Hot 100.Sooooooooo....because it's colored race music it doesn't count?

kargol



Joined: Thu Oct 18th, 2007
Location: Brum, United Kingdom
Posts: 4222
Status: 
Offline
In the late 1940s the R&B charts were called the Race Records charts.

KGB

 

Joined: Wed Jul 4th, 2012
Location:  
Posts: 1000
Status: 
Online
What is the actual mechanism for getting into the HoF?  Is it strictly fan voting?  And when does a band or artist become eligible? 
I'm just asking because I don't understand how Radiohead aren't (A) already inducted and/or (B) unanimous inductees this year.  The band are Pink Floyd/Zeppelin/Stones level in terms of output, sales, acclaim, etc.  If you visit the Best Ever Albums website, they occupy 4 of the top 18 spots.  They were also innovators outside the studio, the honor-system e-release of In Rainbows for example.  I understand if this person or that doesn't connect with them but in the overall picture their track record is unassailable. 
 
https://www.besteveralbums.com/overall.php?o=&f=&fv=&orderby=-InfoRankScore&sortdir=asc&page=1

Last edited on Fri Oct 12th, 2018 12:17 pm by KGB

TerryWWWF



Joined: Mon Nov 26th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 4313
Status: 
Offline
WongLee wrote: TerryWWWF wrote: Those were all No. 1 on the R & B charts, not the Billboard Hot 100.Sooooooooo....because it's colored race music it doesn't count?

The designation "No. 1 record" applies to the Billboard Hot 100, which has been the standard for decades. Being No. 1 on the R & B chart is like being No. 1 on the Easy Listening chart. It's competition limited to a particular genre of music.
Kind of like the difference between an "All-America" football player and a Small College All-America football player.

beejmi
The Big Kahuna


Joined: Sat Oct 13th, 2007
Location: Philly
Posts: 39858
Status: 
Offline
I dunno.



R & B acts in the Rock & Roll Hall Of Fame?



Isn't this how we ended up having a black 'Miss America' complete with a black girl winning the regular 'Miss America' also and  the blonde All-American girl with big cans crying in the background?

beejmi
The Big Kahuna


Joined: Sat Oct 13th, 2007
Location: Philly
Posts: 39858
Status: 
Offline
By the way if you let Joan Jett into the R & R Hall Of Fame, then you put Stevie Nicks in also

srossi
Mr Monday Night!
 

Joined: Sun Oct 14th, 2007
Location: New York USA
Posts: 46742
Status: 
Offline
Erick Von Erich wrote: That Alice in Chains/Warrant story is interesting. When AiC first came out in late 1990 with the single "We Die Young", they were going for that hair band/pop metal vibe. I remember seeing it and thinking they were like a Lynch Mob, Babylon AD, Love/Hate or any other second/third level metal band.

Then, about 3-4 months later, they released "Man in the Box" as a single and they had changed quite a bit... even though it was the same album. So, uh, good marketing?

That summer (1991) they were the opener on the "Clash of the Titans" tour with Slayer and Anthrax. They were almost boo'ed off the stage when they played the Red Rocks (Denver) stop.

So I always thought the "grunge" thing was a little unfair, especially to AiC and Soundgarden. I feel that they were metal bands, first, and got lumped with grunge for marketing purposes.

Alice In Chains’ first album is one of my all-time favorites and I’ve always viewed it as metal. At the very least, it bridges the gap between the genres. They went grungier after that, but I like all their albums, even the new stuff post-Layne. AIC at Hammerstein Ballroom this year was my favorite concert of 2018. Cantrell still kills it and the Duvall, who has probably been the singer now longer than Layne was, is really phenomenal singing Layne’s material. 

WongLee
Hall Of Famer


Joined: Fri Oct 19th, 2007
Location: Bay Shore, New York
Posts: 6615
Status: 
Offline
TerryWWWF wrote: WongLee wrote: TerryWWWF wrote: Those were all No. 1 on the R & B charts, not the Billboard Hot 100.Sooooooooo....because it's colored race music it doesn't count?

The designation "No. 1 record" applies to the Billboard Hot 100, which has been the standard for decades. Being No. 1 on the R & B chart is like being No. 1 on the Easy Listening chart. It's competition limited to a particular genre of music.
Kind of like the difference between an "All-America" football player and a Small College All-America football player.
Gotcha. Thanks for the clarification. However, they still went to the top of the charts even if it was "only" a sub-genre. Maybe they could get the band back together and try to get on top of the white mans chart :cool::tongue:

beejmi
The Big Kahuna


Joined: Sat Oct 13th, 2007
Location: Philly
Posts: 39858
Status: 
Offline
Stupid question: Once you allow 'R & B' aren't you opening the door to 'Hip Hop' in the R & R Hall of Fame?

TerryWWWF



Joined: Mon Nov 26th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 4313
Status: 
Offline
WongLee wrote: TerryWWWF wrote: WongLee wrote: TerryWWWF wrote: Those were all No. 1 on the R & B charts, not the Billboard Hot 100.Sooooooooo....because it's colored race music it doesn't count?

The designation "No. 1 record" applies to the Billboard Hot 100, which has been the standard for decades. Being No. 1 on the R & B chart is like being No. 1 on the Easy Listening chart. It's competition limited to a particular genre of music.
Kind of like the difference between an "All-America" football player and a Small College All-America football player.
Gotcha. Thanks for the clarification. However, they still went to the top of the charts even if it was "only" a sub-genre. Maybe they could get the band back together and try to get on top of the white mans chart :cool::tongue:It's not the "white mans chart," it's the chart, the one that's always cited.
By the way, KC & The Sunshine Band had four No. 1 hits on the Billboard R & B chart, and front man KC is only slightly less white than Bob Backlund.

beejmi
The Big Kahuna


Joined: Sat Oct 13th, 2007
Location: Philly
Posts: 39858
Status: 
Offline
Trying to name 'KC & The Sunshine Band's' (4) #1 hits

Shake shake shake

Boogieman


Thats all I got

WongLee
Hall Of Famer


Joined: Fri Oct 19th, 2007
Location: Bay Shore, New York
Posts: 6615
Status: 
Offline
beejmi wrote: Trying to name 'KC & The Sunshine Band's' (4) #1 hits

Shake shake shake

Boogieman


Thats all I got
That's the Way Uh Huh Uh Huh I Like It Uh Huh Uh Huh

Get Down Tonight.

During that 1975 Shea Stadium concert I mentioned in my Rufus post, K.C. and the Sunshine Band headlined. One of the greatest shows I've ever seen in my life. He did close to a 20 minute version of Get Down Tonight. You could see the cocaine residue sweating out of the bands pores. Just epic stuff. I'm not a fan of horn sections but K.C.'s was just unbelievable. 

Last edited on Sat Oct 13th, 2018 09:48 pm by WongLee

WongLee
Hall Of Famer


Joined: Fri Oct 19th, 2007
Location: Bay Shore, New York
Posts: 6615
Status: 
Offline
TerryWWWF wrote: WongLee wrote: TerryWWWF wrote: WongLee wrote: TerryWWWF wrote: Those were all No. 1 on the R & B charts, not the Billboard Hot 100.Sooooooooo....because it's colored race music it doesn't count?

The designation "No. 1 record" applies to the Billboard Hot 100, which has been the standard for decades. Being No. 1 on the R & B chart is like being No. 1 on the Easy Listening chart. It's competition limited to a particular genre of music.
Kind of like the difference between an "All-America" football player and a Small College All-America football player.
Gotcha. Thanks for the clarification. However, they still went to the top of the charts even if it was "only" a sub-genre. Maybe they could get the band back together and try to get on top of the white mans chart :cool::tongue:It's not the "white mans chart," it's the chart, the one that's always cited.
By the way, KC & The Sunshine Band had four No. 1 hits on the Billboard R & B chart, and front man KC is only slightly less white than Bob Backlund.
Well that's where it starts. Next thing you know they'll be listening to swing music, smoking marijuana, and dancing with colored folk.

srossi
Mr Monday Night!
 

Joined: Sun Oct 14th, 2007
Location: New York USA
Posts: 46742
Status: 
Offline
beejmi wrote: Stupid question: Once you allow 'R & B' aren't you opening the door to 'Hip Hop' in the R & R Hall of Fame?

Hip hop is already in so I don’t get the question. And I really don’t see much resemblance between R&B and hip hop anyway, other than black people play it. But blues is black too and all the rock pioneers started there and are in the HOF. 

tamalie
Hall Of Famer
 

Joined: Mon Oct 22nd, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 4003
Status: 
Offline
The connection to R&B and Hip Hop stems from the sampling of the former by the latter and the fact that so many rap songs from the last twenty years have R&B singers and R&B songs have rap verses, not to mention that you now have a lot of rappers who are flat out singing. I think of the two as intertwined since the early 1990s.

srossi
Mr Monday Night!
 

Joined: Sun Oct 14th, 2007
Location: New York USA
Posts: 46742
Status: 
Offline
The 2019 inductees will be:

Def Leppard (winner of the fan vote)
Radiohead
Stevie Nicks
Janet Jackson
The Cure
The Zombies
Roxy Music

Count Grog
Hall Of Famer


Joined: Sun Oct 21st, 2007
Location: Fuquay Varina, NC, USA
Posts: 15594
Status: 
Offline
Maybe the worst class ever, Def Leppard had 1 good album, Radiohead is a hipster band that if I heard them on the radio I couldnt tell you who they were, Janet Jackson is a cheese pop diva and deserving of being honored but it a separate pop wing (with Madonna, Etc)
The Cure - a ok 80's post punk band probably deserving
Stevie Nicks, again her pop solo career was 1 good album
Zombies- very deserving
Roxy Music good band hipster before there were hipsters

WongLee
Hall Of Famer


Joined: Fri Oct 19th, 2007
Location: Bay Shore, New York
Posts: 6615
Status: 
Offline
Count Grog wrote: Janet Jackson is a cheese pop diva and deserving of being honored but it a separate pop wing (with Madonna, Etc)
It's true. She's the Harold Baines of pop music.

freebirdsforever2001
Fantasia is running wild!


Joined: Tue Jul 8th, 2008
Location: Pittsgrove, New Jersey USA
Posts: 20473
Status: 
Offline
WongLee wrote: - Def Leppard - definitely yes. They sold several metric tons worth of albums. Not without its controversy though. I firmly believe Pete Willis should be up there. Do you ignore Vivian Campbell who has been with them (and everyone else seemingly) for well over 20 years?

- Devo - as far as originality goes. A definite yes. They have a boatload of great tunes and were indeed very popular in the late 70's and 80's. Borderline choice.

- Janet Jackson - Janet was a super-duper star for a while almost in the same ballpark as Michael. She was gutsy enough to experiment with different genres of music and was a fashion icon. Maybe

- John Prine - I went over to KKKlassics to see if Crimson Danny was salivating at the thought of this guy going in. Surprisingly he wasn't. If Dan Chernau doesn't think he's good enough, WongLee doesn't think he's good enough

- Kraftwerk - even Kraftwerks moms don't like Kraftwerk. The Fuhrer would have thrown these guys in Treblinka and have been done with them.

- LL Cool J - the guy was a massive star in his day. Decent actor too. But then you have the age old argument do colored hippity hoppity guys belong in a R8R HOF.

- MC5 - everyones kneejerk reaction is usually...YES, YES, HELL YES. But can you name one song besides Kick Out the Jams? Plus that song was only famous because they used the word motherfucker. Yeah they influenced a subgenre of music that was never that big to begin with. Neckbearded critics from the 70's through the 90's thought these guys were revolutionary but me, I'll take the Stooges anytime.

- Radiohead - probably yes because they were huge. Not a fan at all. However, millions are so that trumps me.

- Rage Against the Machine - sure. Great songs, great live band. But keep in mind, these guys aren't revolutionaries along the lines of Che and Pancho Villa. They are millionaire rock stars who sleep on mattresses stuffed with hundred dollar bills.

- Roxy Music - loved these guys in the 70's. Great, great albums and fashion icons. They will not make the cut though.

- Stevie Nicks - Stevie is just an enormous talent. Her solo albums are easily as good as anything Mac put out. I would vote yes.

- The Cure - too depressed to type anything

- Todd Rundgren - as a producer this is a no brainer. As a performer, totally meh.

- Rufus & Chaka Khan - I would vote yes. No, my "white guilt" is not making me do so. I say these guys at Shea Stadium in 1975 and they rocked as hard as any of their contemporaries. Everyone in this band were elite level musicians. Very enjoyable to listen to and watch on stage. Plus, for the decade of the 70's, Chaka Khan was the hottest woman on the planet. That was until her manager kept giving her two-fer coupons to Arbys.

- The Zombies - why?

Out of this list I rated these as the following:1. Stevie Nicks. As the Wonger said, she could sing her ass off.2. Janet Jackson. "Sorry Ms. Jackson, ooh, I am for real" She went against the grain at times and even had a few hard rockin' type of songs.3. Todd Rundgren. Incredible producer.4. LL Cool J. had some great songs and is a multi- faceted talent.5. Rage Against the Machine. Huge Tom Morello fan6. Rufus & Chaka Chan. great middle of the road band.
The Rest, nah.

freebirdsforever2001
Fantasia is running wild!


Joined: Tue Jul 8th, 2008
Location: Pittsgrove, New Jersey USA
Posts: 20473
Status: 
Offline
Erick Von Erich wrote: That Alice in Chains/Warrant story is interesting. When AiC first came out in late 1990 with the single "We Die Young", they were going for that hair band/pop metal vibe. I remember seeing it and thinking they were like a Lynch Mob, Babylon AD, Love/Hate or any other second/third level metal band.

Then, about 3-4 months later, they released "Man in the Box" as a single and they had changed quite a bit... even though it was the same album. So, uh, good marketing?

That summer (1991) they were the opener on the "Clash of the Titans" tour with Slayer and Anthrax. They were almost boo'ed off the stage when they played the Red Rocks (Denver) stop.

So I always thought the "grunge" thing was a little unfair, especially to AiC and Soundgarden. I feel that they were metal bands, first, and got lumped with grunge for marketing purposes.

Alice In Chains opened up for Van Hagar around 1991 or so and someone threw a beer bottle at Layne Staley and he stormed off the stage. Before leaving he said, "Fuck Philly and fuck Van Halen". Good times.



UltraBB 1.172 Copyright © 2007-2013 Data 1 Systems