View single post by Angelic Assassin
 Posted: Fri Apr 16th, 2021 01:19 am
PM Quote Reply Full Topic
Angelic Assassin



Joined: Mon Dec 27th, 2010
Location: Home Of The Redskins, You Candy Asses. , Washington USA
Posts: 8280
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
khawk wrote: I guess the question is how long the officer should have/could have waited before firing. The time is so fast between the kid stopping and the officer shooting, two points of view are valid, IMO:
1) The officer belived the kid had a gun (and according to Blazer he did basically up until he stopped), so the perp stopping and turning would have been grounds to shoot if the officer believed he was armed.
2) The officer gave the perp no time to show he did not have the gun anymore and might have been trying to just put his hands up to surrender.

If the officer waits and the kid still had the gun, the officer is the one who is dead. But at the same time it's not wrong to say he should have waited another split second to see if the kid really still had the weapon.

Complete catch-22 here to me.

The public and some people here seem to think that cops should be waiting to see if they are killed before responding in any way and that any time someone is being taken into custody and they resist they should just be allowed to leave.




____________________
This thread was great till Rossi posted that AA ruined it.

Rossi=The Mouth That Bored