 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Sun Oct 14th, 2007 |
| Location: | New York USA |
| Posts: | 62588 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
This seems strange. Musk paid a premium price for this. It came to 1/5 his total wealth. Twitter is not a moneymaker in and of itself. What's his end game because on the surface it seems like at best a very mediocre business deal.
It's just a power play. He has more money than he could ever spend in 50 lifetimes, but he gets off on pissing people off and can pretty much print money from his other businesses at will. This gives him a seat at a different table. The Twitter name is worth more than money.
____________________
This thread was great before AA ruined it.